Uk Gov 'thinking About' Anti-tampering Regs!

Discussion in 'Triumph General Discussion' started by beerkat, Oct 12, 2021.

  1. toony73

    toony73 New Member

    Oct 14, 2021
    1
    3
    coventry england
    There are more modified cars out there than bikes trust me,
    we all know to swap parts for mot time pop the old cat exhuast back on if you have a jobsworth tester.
    the government dont know an important decision if it beats them up ;)
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. Wessa

    Wessa Cruising

    Apr 27, 2016
    11,624
    1,000
    North West England
    I have downloaded and read the report. From what I have read the focus is on ‘tampering products’ and the advertising and sale of these products. It covers all vehicles or non-road mobile machinery (NRMM), like construction equipment.
    From what I can glean the focus is on emissions and it looks like they are trying to close the loophole the diesel scandal created, where false claims were made by many car manufacturers. In addition specific powers to cover automated vehicles which current legislation does not cover.
    Ok there are a lot more clever people out there than me, but I cannot see that the current paper opens the door for the removal of the ability to fit after market products unless they quote “bypass, defeat, reduce the effectiveness of or render inoperative a system, part or component (the product may be a physical part or component, hardware and/or software)”
    So changing out indicators or replacing an exhaust that meet noise levels etc does not seem to be to be included.
    So it is good that MAG are monitoring the progress of the consultation and hopefully in the final analysis it will not have the impact that is feared it will have. :);)
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. beerkat

    beerkat Senior Member

    Aug 14, 2019
    877
    243
    Cheshire UK
    My knowledge of the world of modified cars is rather limited so I will take your word for it. So are you suggesting there will be an outcry from these hordes of car owners against type-approval, so we can sit back and rely on them to do the job for us? Maybe you're right. That's if they know about it. Governments have a way of sneaking this type of proposal into law by doing the bare minimum when it comes to informing the public. Look at it logically, if the vast majority of car owners don't give a :poop: because they have no intention of modifying their vehicles, and the DfT can convince them it's all in a good cause, then they're going to ignore the issue and those that enjoy tinkering (or 'tampering') with their cars will be hugely outnumbered. Game over.

    My point is that if we don't speak out, or preferably shout out loud, then this could well happen and it's no good waiting for modified-car enthusiasts or anyone else to get vocal. If we don't say something then the government isn't going to know that we care. So say something.

    And as far as 'popping the old cat exhaust back on' at MOT time, are you having a laugh? It would take several days for me to return my bike to standard, in fact I couldn't. My local MOT man ignores slightly dodgy number plates (because he can claim that wasn't the one on the bike when he tested it) and as there is no requirement to actually measure exhaust noise, he's happy to use 'his judgement'. But present him with a bike with a dozen or more changes and he'd be hard pressed to turn a blind eye.
     
  4. beerkat

    beerkat Senior Member

    Aug 14, 2019
    877
    243
    Cheshire UK
    Hope you're right Wessa. Maybe I'm wrong about this issue and I agree that some of what's in the report can be interpreted in different ways, but isn't that always the way..and the intention? We shall see.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. Wessa

    Wessa Cruising

    Apr 27, 2016
    11,624
    1,000
    North West England
    Agreed. I also completed the survey and the questions provide a better insight to the proposals.. it is well worth the effort to go through :)
     
  6. Wessa

    Wessa Cruising

    Apr 27, 2016
    11,624
    1,000
    North West England
    Agreed. I also completed the survey and the questions provide a better insight to the proposals.. it is well worth the effort to go through :)
     
  7. Kenbro

    Kenbro Noble Member

    Jul 9, 2019
    830
    443
    Manchester, UK
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. nickjaxe

    nickjaxe Active Member

    Sep 2, 2020
    63
    28
    Cheshire UK
    Not everybody like to hear the NOTE motorbike.....we need to remind ourselves of this.

    I love em.
     
  9. nickjaxe

    nickjaxe Active Member

    Sep 2, 2020
    63
    28
    Cheshire UK
    This gov is dim???? OMG are you a Labour Supporter.
     
  10. nickjaxe

    nickjaxe Active Member

    Sep 2, 2020
    63
    28
    Cheshire UK
     
  11. nickjaxe

    nickjaxe Active Member

    Sep 2, 2020
    63
    28
    Cheshire UK
    One of the reasons I kept my CAT after fitting an X-pipe to my T100.
     
  12. Richard Goss

    Richard Goss Senior Member

    Jan 6, 2019
    525
    143
    Newbury
    Unfortunately much as I disagree with government interference I think the minority have f**ked it up for the rest of us.
    I live in a supposedly idyllic village and regularly have to listen to the Harley owners with their look at me straight out pipes reverberating for miles, and the 125 brigade with lots of noise and no go.
    I don't mind the noise but can appreciate that non-bikers get very pissed off.
    I was in the local bikers cafe bike night that has several signs saying 'we don't mind your exhaust but our neighbors do so please be respectful when leaving' needless to say there was a lot of guys that thought a 125 sounded great with no silencer and the neighbors would like a BMW SS1000R with race pipe on full throttle leaving and returning.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  13. Iceman

    Iceman Crème de la Crème

    Apr 19, 2020
    2,359
    1,000
    Lancashire
    Wessa gives a very good account of what is being discussed at present by Government, it is all linked to meeting the climate programme i.e. emissions. There is already current legislation in place that allows for the prosecution for having an exhaust on any vehicle that exceeds the prescribed legal limit, the Motor Cycle Noise Act 1987 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 18 October 2021. Look this up and it will become apparent that the majority of forum members are breaking the law (me included). The framework looked at covers "all road going vehicles" not just motorcycles, rally cars are heavily modified and cover public road sections, agricultural vehicles, the list goes on. It is certainly not a case of "a minority spoil it for others, with excessively loud exhausts", the reality is the Government have committed to climate change implementation. It is not about banning and the fitting of aftermarket parts, if that was the case you would not be able to fit anything that became faulty on any vehicle, other than OEM parts fitted by the makers dealer, could you imagine your car failing the MOT on say a track rod end, ball joint or wheel bearing etc, go along to your nearest motor factor spares shop, and are told "sorry sir we no longer sell aftermarket parts, Oh and you could not fit them if we did. This would affect tens of thousands of manufacturers, suppliers, retail outlets and much much more. Flipping heck we would have a shortage of HGVs on the roads, a lack of enough trained mechanics in dealerships. This is about "climate control" and proposed target dates for implementation. The Police are unable to cope with current pressures let alone any additional ones related to exhausts etc etc. You only have to look at the push for electric vehicles, the future banning of new gas boilers, LED bulbs have been brought in, you will be lucky to find any old stock domestic tungsten bulbs. E10 petrol imposed with further Ethanol added in the near future. I for one will carry on enjoying riding my bike with it's lovely Yoshimura exhaust sound. Ride safe all.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  14. Graeme_D

    Graeme_D Active Member

    Aug 31, 2015
    132
    43
    Edinburgh
    The biggest issue I see with this bill, is that if it goes ahead, and you can't fit aftermarket parts, then that's pretty much an attack on the lower income folks who can't afford the riduculous prices for OEM parts.
    I've got a 2003 yamaha FJR1300 at the moment, and there's a hole in the exhaust near the headers, which my 'repairs' are not helping now, so it's needing replaced. the choice is either a £250 aftermarket option, or an £800+ OEM system, as it's one piece (great idea there guys!). That's over half the value of the bike!
    A lot of people don't buy after market parts because they want the power or sound, it's because they honestly can't afford to replace them with OEM parts!
     
    • Agree Agree x 5
    • Like Like x 2
  15. Iceman

    Iceman Crème de la Crème

    Apr 19, 2020
    2,359
    1,000
    Lancashire
    #35 Iceman, Oct 21, 2021
    Last edited: Oct 21, 2021
    I would urge all forum members in the UK to respond urgently and directly to these proposals, if you go to www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/ETVHG5 you can fill out the form outlining any objections and comments you may have, (it is fairly lengthy) deliberate I suspect, please be aware there is only a timeframe of "eight weeks" to do so, remember this will and does "affect us all". There is no information regarding if the proposed legislation will be retrospective, this is a very real threat to our freedom to choose. It may be that the intention is to remove as many current vehicles of the road by STEALTH, this will surly affect those that live on a tighter budget the most, remember it is aimed at all vehicles. What really frustrates me is the IAM and other motoring organisations are not onto this and campaigning on behalf of the membership. I have e mailed the IAM but given the short time frame for the survey response I don't hold out much hope from those organisations. ​
     
    • Useful Useful x 1
  16. beerkat

    beerkat Senior Member

    Aug 14, 2019
    877
    243
    Cheshire UK
    I think you'll find that MAG (yes, here I go again :p) are aware of this and have already approached the DfT with serious concerns. So you either ignore it and assume it will go away (which is of course what most people will do), complete the survey form and hope that's good enough (which it probably won't be..do you think they actually take any notice of individual opinions, especially from a minority group like motorcyclists?) or join an organisation that is actively getting involved and trying to work with (not just complain to) the DfT on behalf of us lot. We've just been told that the IAM are 'not onto this'..so who you gonna call? Ghostbusters! Although MAG might be a more sensible option :cool:.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. Iceman

    Iceman Crème de la Crème

    Apr 19, 2020
    2,359
    1,000
    Lancashire
    Hi Beerkat, I have written to the following organisations, RAC - AA - IAM - NABD - and the TOMCC requesting they respond to these DFT proposals with a matter of urgency. I have also filled in the survey, I was also aware that MAG are involved (purely by chance), indeed it was MAG that alerted the motorcycling community, however as you say it takes a lot of clout to make Government enter into any constructive dialogue, however that said if people do nothing then a large proportion of riders will demonised and criminalised, and this is a reality, just look up the survey to see what these proposals really hold. At this stage as I mentioned in a previous post there is no information if the proposal's will become retrospective, now that is a very scary thought.
     
    • Useful Useful x 1
  18. capt

    capt Elite Member

    May 8, 2016
    3,050
    750
    western Australia
    Hi , in Australia , there is a little known regulation/law in the vehicles side , it applies to All Vehicles.
    The wording implies , there can be no variation in parts fitted other than Standard !! So if your Volvo,Ducati,Hino came fitted with 55/60w headlight bulbs , you have to replace them with the same ! You aren't allowed to go up 55/70 or 55/100 ! It is seldom used in any way as much of the thing's that are modified require an inspection by an Engineer/Examiner !!
     
    • Useful Useful x 1
  19. capt

    capt Elite Member

    May 8, 2016
    3,050
    750
    western Australia
    #39 capt, Oct 26, 2021
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2021
    And Even stranger !! If the Catalytic Converter in your vehicle wears out!! You don't have to replace it !!
    Go figure ??!!??!!


    An observation that governments don't put much thought into .... these Anti-tampering laws will be monitored by Police Officers who for the most part only have very basic instruction or education (knowledge) of Vehicle MOT requirements to begin with !! This is the main reason that most people in Australia aren't dealt with as they possibly could be when they "Modify" their Veh's
     
    • Like Like x 2
  20. beerkat

    beerkat Senior Member

    Aug 14, 2019
    877
    243
    Cheshire UK
    Here's the latest, hot-off-the-press, news (from MAG).
    The reactions and responses already sent to the DfT re. it's anti-tampering proposals have already had an impact (who said we can't make a difference?).
    MAG and BMF members met with DfT officials and it was clear from their comments that they realise there is an enormous strength of feeling on this issue. They recognise that there were many unintended consequences that could potentially follow the introduction of their proposals, which they weren't aware of.
    The DfT have agreed to meet again soon for further discussions, where they will go through their proposals in depth and look at the details.
    The DfT wanted to make it clear that their aim is to avoid the tampering of vehicles in a way that makes them less safe or increases emissions.

    Ok, so what do we do now? MAG and the BMF needs members to list all kinds of activity and modifications that they think are legitimate but may be potentially affected by these proposals. This might include restoration of older bikes, customisation, performance alterations and ergonomic mods.

    This is needed within a week to allow DfT officials time to respond, before the consultation deadline expires.
    The easiest way to do it is through MAG at: [email protected]
    You do not have to be a member to do this!

    So well done and thanks to those people that bothered to respond. But it's not over yet..and time is short!
     
    • Like Like x 1
Loading...

Share This Page