I didn't, it was a quote from an article. That is normally the reason people use those funny little things called quotation marks before and after, you know the ones right? And even the article didn't say anything about 'Jewish' only Zionists. You said that I mentioned 'Jewish', which is a lie. Reading is fundamental.
Good find. The only issue is that the article never really gives any proof that the vaccine is safe other than one doctor's opinion that it is. But the video has several doctors saying it is not safe. Specialties and countries aside, don't they all go to basically the same medical school? Deciding who is right is an individual decision.
Er, the whole video is a fraud... That was the point of the article (which it clearly states) is that premise is to show how woo and fake news is having a negative effect. I didn’t post it thinking you would believe the fake arguments - I guess it was inevitable you would. This is a great lesson into the psychology of a conspiracy theorist
Fully agree. this kind of guy are in belief and won't change. We already walked from not having the jab, stupid assumption about autism, then alt right conspi links, then anti zoinist bullshit, and now the word "liberal" was finally used . We should not wait for some reopen 911 or flat earth stupidities. No need to waste our time.
I quoted an article that said "Zionist Rothschild" and you idiots blew it up. By the way if the family even says they are Zionist how is this racists or anti Semitic?
And now you are insulting me as "idiot"? really? You put the link, so you know what's in. You are sick.
You have proven you don’t read though. The paper you used to ‘prove’ all vaccines were dangerous (based upon an outdated 1960 scenario), and that it was not possible to sue the pharmaceutical companies after FDA approval was the OPPOSITE of the papers clearly written conclusions. You have a conspiracy theorist agenda and find ‘evidence’ supporting your bizarre propositions even when no such evidence is presented. You actively ignore or overlook inconvenient evidence that doesn’t support your preconceived ideology. You do know that isn’t how critical thinking is supposed to work?
and using "details" out of context as confirmation bias, flood with links, quickly passing over refuted assumption (eg autism) and flood with new conspiracy material. And as things starts to get obvious, insults. They all act the same.
What annoys me about these drooling fwits like him is that they all want lockdown to end but spread their ridiculous assertions infecting others with their garbage thus making it all likely to last longer. The upside is hopefully they'll get culled and thus raise the collective IQ of this forum.
I have no problem with vaccines. What concerns me are the muppets who refuse to take them, catch the disease and pass it on to the unvaccinated and/or expect me to pay for their medical treatment. Those who refuse vaccines without valid medical reasons need to have “FW” tattooed on their faces so we know who to avoid in public.
I understood the meaning behind the article, but I choose to disagree with it. As with any topic there should always be dissenting views, if not we would live in a dysfunctional society. I don't know if you are old enough to remember, I am not, but at one time smoking was touted to be healthy, then a group of people said it wasn't and the tobacco industry tried to silence them. Same thing here, and I may be completely wrong, but without different viewpoints we would never find out the real truth.
Easy answer, let people make their own choices. If some want to stay locked in their homes to avoid getting sick, let them. If people want to get on with life and take heir chances, let them. If you want to wear a mask I have no issue with that but that does not mean I should have to wear one. If masks work then stop the lock downs. If vaccines work why do those that are vaccinated still need masks?
Good observation. But it didn't start that way, I started with out open to debate and willing to at least look at other view points, then I was attacked for my point of view. Look back at the older posts, I didn't start calling people dim or racists until I was attacked.
Look back at your own words and assumptions. You labeled me as a "genuine conspiracy theorist" and flat earther ect. I don't trust in the system so that may make me a bit of a conspiracy theorist but I am not overwhelmed by it and I don't give any thought to the flat earth thing. Also don't believe that a pedophile satanic cult rules the world, although I do think more should be done to combat human trafficking. I also believe that pedophiles should be publicly executed. If that makes me sick so be it, I will just assume you are good with children being abused. That is how unfounded assumptions work right?
Well a nice Indian curry with the the trimmings rice nan and couple of sauces is looking good right now, what your thoughts
