figwold 'woke'? LOL. Rabid That answers that one then. Not 100% then, just some unquantified number [throws arms up in shock horror]. Btw the Republicans who demanded this Senate hearing hoping to unearth hard evidence are feeling somewhat deflated that the best they can come up with is totally unsubstantiated allegations aka fabrications like those from Trump Michigan Campaign co-chair Lee Tarver. Even worse for their 'case' here's the drunken star witness.
Damage already done? https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/en...el-flynn-suggests_uk_5fc89c03c5b66bc57467873f
That sounds rather disingenuous. Of course it's all about Trump. If he wasn't such a petulant sore loser and conman there would be no widespread distrust. Continuing to air wild speculations and lies as 'truth' in order to bolster the fraud claims Trump sign posted for months beforehand, is entirely designed to undermine the legitimacy of a fairly elected president, that and to grift millions of dollars.. Not one shred of evidence of meaningful fraud has been presented in any of the forty court cases brought by Republicans, including Trumps own lawyers. That's kind of telling. Trumps own appointed cyber security czar declared it the cleanest election ever. AG Barr, in preparation to support Trumps' claims of fraud should he lose, in an unprecedented step ordered the full might of DoJ be on the look out for organised election interference. What did they find? According to Barr, none - no evidence to date that shows anything more than human error and isolated mistakes that would not change the outcome. That's from Barr who has spent the last three years trying his best to establish Trump as a de-facto autocratic king. Admittedly a few people who cast their vote by mail went and died before November 3rd. Then there are the two fraudulent votes cast in Pennsylvania that were unearthed ... but they were cast for Trumps, oops. Bits and pieces of errors and individual fraud is about it. This is a public relations exercise by Donald Trump aided and abetted by the gullible and unscrupulous to keep donations flowing in to his PAC. Reportedly.$170 million so far since the election. This to cover his campaign debts and bolster his slush fund for future scams. Trump is a conman and grifter and so are his immediate family. Oh, and a useful smokescreen to distract everyone from the raft of 'midnight regulations' the Trump Administration is pushing through to stimie the incoming Administration.
I think that’s unfair Rich, I’m sure there are more impressive witnesses than these, after all Rudy Giuliani and Donald Trump have said so, and we can believe everything they say after all...
Because let’s face it, none of these Republican election officials or Secretaries of State can be trusted to investigate their own election counts, and nor can Trump’s own Attorney General, nor his cyber security chief. The longer this goes on the more Trump resembles Kenneth Williams
We jest, but the reality is that it's not funny. Trump set out many months ago to completely discredit the US electoral system, and the hard of thinking have been taken in by it. The damage that man has done in his four years in office is incalculable, both domestically and across the globe. It'll take them many years to recover.
The Supreme Court has no standing except as an Appeals Court. According to the US Constitution, elections are organized at the state level, and it is for them to legislate for and to decide all pertaining matters. Election disputes must first be heard before the states’ courts – first in trial courts, then appellate courts and, if necessary, by the state supreme court. For a case to be handled by the federal courts, there needs to be a “federal question” that involves the Constitution or federal law. For the Supreme Court to grant a request to review a case, at least four justices must accept it has merit. Frivolous claims with unsubstantiated 'what ifs' and 'could haves' won't do. The US election system might be undemocratic due to Republican gerrymandering and voter suppression, and the archaic Electoral College System, but if nothing else the States take the count seriously and devote millions of dollars and man hours to getting the count as accurate as is humanly possible. And one by one the swing states, all Republican controlled, are certifying the election for Biden. Don't you think that if there was even a whiff of real fraud they'd not do so.
Is someone who can’t recite the Constitution any less intelligent than someone who can’t recognize a dog and pony show when he sees one?
Been watching this for a while now and have 2 questions: Callumity what exactly is your point? The rest of you have you heard of teasing the Bear witha pointed stick?