I've finally come over to Triumph after putting big miles on a series of 13 BMWs. First impressions are very good and a trip to Scotland immediately after the first service was an enjoyable ride. Engine is lovely, gearbox far better than BMW, suspension still needs final adjustment but feels promising, handling generally lively and predictable. Still missing the BM's low centre of gravity for slow manoeuvring and surprised how quickly Tiger feels heavy away from plumb. Only real grumbles to date are the outrageous absence of any rear end protection from mud and gravel, plus the dreadful navigation app. I can't believe Triumph sell an adventure bike without even an option of a hugger or shield of any kind for the suspension unit and swinging arm - just not fit for purpose! The Triumph navigation app is a great idea and the connectivity is good but the app is just not sorted yet and the absence of any graphic depiction of road layout on the TFT dash makes complex junctions so confusing that I have stopped using it altogether. It also gobbles up data, so I have reverted to Here We Go's offline function but connectivity cannot access it, so the whole concept falls on its face.
Tom Longsdale Welcome to the family. Do hit the upload a file button and show us all the steed. Regards Joe.
Thanks to all for the warm welcome. I'm new to forums of any kind but the biking fraternity seems to do it very well: I think we stand proud as a group and show more conviviality than so many social platforms. The classic and vintage sectors seem to be especially great places to be based on the mutual help offered at classic events I have taken part in (forgive me, on a Norton not a Triumph!).
Welcome, Tom, from sunny Arizona. You've landed on a terrific forum and a great online community. Thanks for sharing a photo of you and your new Tiger. If I may ask, why the switch after being a long time BMW guy??
Tough question Sandi T and it took a lot of thought. First my wife has been pestering me for a long time "why don't you buy a Triumph, it's British?". I shrugged that off for a long time because BMW and my regular dealer have looked after me for a long time very well. However, the original reasons for going BM were shaft drive and dependable engineering and both reasons have lost a bit of their validity. Firstly , chain technology has progressed and (reputedly) they require less maintenance, although I remain perplexed why exposed metal against exposed metal is still the industry default! Secondly, the quality of finish on BMW has been downgraded so badly that they can no longer endure the weather in my damp part of the UK and I had to have my entire frame repainted under warranty in less than two years on my last GS Adventure. Finally the GSA hides its weight brilliantly on the move but it takes so much to slow it down that I was ripping through brake discs and pads in not time at all and BMW prices for replacement are insane. Only time will tell if the upkeep of the Triumph and residual value will justify the switch but, as my thread said at the beginning, first impressions are of a premium product that is well sorted (apart from the missing hugger and buggy navigation).
Hi and welcome to the forum. As a 900 GT Pro owner I have to agree about the lack of rear hugger (felt the same way about my 800 xrx) and the hopeless satnav connection.
Hi Tom and welcome, you can get an after market hugger i have just fitted one on my 900 GT Pro. It fitted with out any modification and works well. I agree about the navigation it is crap and manage to get me lost a few times, i will revert back to my Garmin for now. Good riding.
Thanks Honda man. I've just done a new search and see that Pyramid now do one but that didn't come up when I first searched. I still think the industry is out of order relying on aftermarket availability for such a fundamental necessity: they really ought to fit something as standard and, failing that, at least offer an OEM optional extra.
Im in the market for a mid weight adventure bike. The Tiger 900 rally pro is top of my list. But I will want to lower the seat somewhat by fitting the lower seat. But currently the low seat for the 900 range is only availible in non heated version as far as I can see. So I will be downgrading a little. Not the end of the world. But slightly irritating. Sorry for the thread Hijack. But does anyone know if a low heated seat is incoming, or whether moving the element from one seat to another is a viable home DIY job? Cheers. Lee
I'm tempted to offer you my seat Lee: I've had heated seats in my car for ten years but never switched them on and cannot imagine doing so on the bike. Perhaps my bum is abnormally insulated but has never been cold despite other extremities being fit to drop off!
I'm based in Norway. But even if its a lot colder here. If I'm dressed even close to what I need on a given day. I'd assume my perch would be OK. So i agree with you. I guess its an OCD thing. Just seems a shame to have a bike with nice integrated heated seats and pay money to add a non heated seat. But I think going from 850mm to 830mm seat height will be a bit of a deal breaker.